Non-invasive cardiac activation mapping and identification of severity of epicardial substrate in Brugada Syndrome: a case report.

Introduction: It has recently been shown that electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) can be employed in individuals undergoing an ajmaline test who have Brugada Syndrome (BrS), to evaluate the extent of substrate-involved arrhythmia in the right ventricular overflow tract (RVOT). For the first time, we stratify the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in BrS during ajmaline testing using the dST-Tiso interval (a robust predictor of the inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in the presence of drug-induced BrS type-1 pattern) in combination with ECGi technology. Case presentation: We studied a 48-year-old man with BrS ECG type-2 pattern and presence of J-wave without a family history of SCD but with a previous syncope. Transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging were performed, showing normal results. The ECG was performed to assess the novel ECG marker "dST-Tiso interval." The 3D epicardial mapping of the RVOT surface was performed with the support of a non-contact cardiac mapping system in sinus rhythm during ajmaline infusion. The examination of the propagation map unveiled the presence of multiple conduction blocks in this pathologic epicardial region, and the conduction blocks were identified within the central part and/or near the boundary separating the normal and slow conduction areas. Conclusion: The dST-Tiso interval, which lies between the onset and termination of the coved ST-segment elevation and serves as a robust predictor of VA inducibility in cases of drug-induced BrS type-1 pattern, was utilized in conjunction with ECGi technology (employed for the non-invasive confirmation and identification of the pathological substrate area). This combined approach was applied to stratify the risk of SCD in BrS during ajmaline testing, alongside clinical scores.

Investigating Deep Sedation With Intravenous Ketamine in Spontaneous Respiration During Pulsed-Field Ablation.

OBJECTIVES: The authors report their experience of a protocol for deep sedation with ketamine in spontaneous respiration during the pulsed-field ablation (PFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). DESIGN: Observational, prospective, nonrandomized fashion. SETTING: Single-center hospitalized patients. PARTICIPANTS: All consecutive patients undergoing PFA of AF. INTERVENTIONS: Patients undergoing deep sedation with intravenous ketamine. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors' sedation protocol involves the intravenous administration of fentanyl (1.5 µg/kg) and midazolam (2 mg) at low doses before local anesthesia with lidocaine. A ketamine adjunct (1 mg/kg) in 5-minute boluses was injected about 5 minutes before the first PFA delivery. The authors enrolled 117 patients (age = 59 ± 10 y, 74.4% males, body mass index = 27.6 ± 5 kg/m2, fluoroscopy time = 24 ± 14 minutes, skin-to-skin time = 80 ± 40 minutes and PFA LA dwell time = 24 ± 7 minutes). By the end of the procedure, pulmonary vein isolation had been achieved in all patients using PFA alone. The mean time under sedation was 54.9 ± 6 minutes, with 92 patients (79%) being sedated for <1 hour. A satisfactory Ramsay Sedation Scale level before ketamine administration was achieved in all patients, except one (80.3% of the patients with rank 3; 18.4% with rank 2). In all procedures, the satisfaction level was found acceptable by both the patient and the primary operator (satisfactory in 98.2% of cases). All patients achieved a Numeric Rating Scale for Pain ≤3 (none or mild). No major procedure or anesthesia-related complications were reported. CONCLUSION: The authors' standardized sedation protocol with the administration of drugs with rapid onset and pharmacologic offset at low doses was safe and effective, with an optimal degree of patient and operator satisfaction.

Sedation strategies for pulsed-field ablation of atrial fibrillation: focus on deep sedation with intravenous ketamine in spontaneous respiration.

AIMS: A standardized sedation protocol for pulsed-field ablation (PFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) through irreversible cellular electroporation has not been well established. We report our experience of a protocol for deep sedation with ketamine in spontaneous respiration during the PFA of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive patients undergoing PFA for AF at our center were included. Our sedation protocol involves the intravenous administration of fentanyl (1.5 mcg/kg) and midazolam (2 mg) at low doses before local anesthesia with lidocaine. A ketamine adjunct (1 mg/kg) was injected about 5 minutes before the first PFA delivery. We enrolled 66 patients (age = 59 ± 9 years, 78.8% males, body mass index = 28.8 ± 5 kg/m2, fluoroscopy time = 21[15-30] min, skin-to-skin time = 75[60-100] min and PFA LA dwell time = 25[22-28] min). By the end of the procedure, PVI had been achieved in all patients by means of PFA alone. The mean time under sedation was 56.4 ± 6 min, with 50 (76%) patients being sedated for less than 1 hour. A satisfactory Ramsey Sedation Scale level before ketamine infusion was achieved in all patients except one (78.8% of the patients with rank 3; 19.7% with rank 2). In all procedures, the satisfaction level was found to be acceptable by both the patient and the primary operator (Score = 0 in 98.5% of cases). All patients reported none or mild pain. No major procedure or anesthesia-related complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Our standardized sedation protocol with the administration of drugs with rapid onset and pharmacological offset at low doses was safe and effective, with an optimal degree of patient and operator satisfaction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Advanced TecHnologies For SuccEssful AblatioN of AF in Clinical Practice (ATHENA). URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/Identifier: NCT05617456.

dST-Tiso Interval, a Novel Electrocardiographic Marker of Ventricular Arrhythmia Inducibility in Individuals With Ajmaline-Induced Brugada Type I Pattern.

The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of a novel electrocardiographic (ECG) marker in predicting ventricular arrhythmia (VA) inducibility in individuals with drug-induced Brugada syndrome (BrS) type I pattern. Consecutive patients with drug-induced type I BrS pattern underwent programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) and, according to their response, were divided into 2 groups. Clinical characteristics and 12-lead ECG intervals before and after ajmaline infusion were compared between the 2 groups. A novel ECG marker named dST-Tiso interval consisting in the interval between the onset of the coved ST-segment elevation and its termination at the isoelectric line was also evaluated. Our cohort included 76 individuals (median age 44 years, 75% male). Twenty-five (32.9%) had VA inducibility requiring defibrillation. As compared with not inducible subjects, those with VA inducibility were more frequently male (92% vs 65%, p = 0.013), had longer PQ interval (basal: 172 vs 152 ms, p = 0.033; after ajmaline: 216 vs 200 ms, p = 0.040), higher J peak (0.6 vs 0.5 mV, p = 0.006) and longer dST-Tiso (360 vs 240 ms, p < 0.001). The dST-Tiso showed a C-statistics of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.82 to 0.99) and an adjusted odds ratio for VA of 1.03 (1.01 to 1.04, p < 0.001). A dST-Tiso interval >300 ms yielded a sensitivity of 92.0%, a specificity of 90.2%, positive and negative predictive values of 82.1% and 95.8%. In conclusion, the dST-Tiso interval is a powerful predictor of VA inducibility in drug-induced BrS type I pattern. External validation is needed, but this marker might be useful in the clinical counseling process of these individuals before invasive PVS.

Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices during COVID-19 outbreak: "keep people safe" and "focus only on health care needs".

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged the ability of health care organisations to provide adequate care. We report the experience of a national tertiary electrophysiology centre in the management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) through the use of a fully remote follow-up model. METHODS: We daily and prospectively collected remote monitoring (RM) relevant findings and following clinical actions performed from March 10th to April 3rd 2020, a period of suspension of routine ambulatory activity due to the national lockdown. RESULTS: During the study period (25 days), we received 2,215 transmissions from 2,955 devices. Among them, 129 patients reported potential clinically actionable RM observations (event rate: 12.0/1000 patient-week). In 77 patients (60%), RM events triggered a clinical action, but only 5 patients needed an urgent in-hospital access (4 urgent procedures and 1 device reprogramming). CONCLUSIONS: In the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic, RM became an essential tool in healthcare delivery for CIED patients. We observed that RM was effective in "keep people safe" and "focus only on individuals with health care needs".